A. PRESS RELEASE (EMBARGOED)
Contact: [email protected]
IMSG ANNOUNCES THE CANADIAN COLD SPARK™ 10-YEAR POWER-CELL
Quantum Fusion applicable to domestic, space, and defence markets
RICHMOND HILL, Ontario – TBA – Intelligent Market Solutions Group (IMSG) seeks commonwealth country partners for a 2018 US$1 billion cost savings and revenue generation field test, as a sustainability business case for the public development and roadshow of the Cold Spark™ Mark III consumer class 10KW home battery, and Mark IV city class 10MW+ industrial complex power-grid power-cell.
Municipalities are sought to enhance their existing power-grid in three ways:
1. Reduce power generation cost by 50%+,
2. increase reliability of power delivery, and
3. reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and clean up environmental issues like industrial class CANDU reactor byproducts.
July 22, 2016 Excess heat evidence of the Cold Spark™ handheld “affordable, robust, compact” (ARC) reactor format Mark I proof-of-concept firing up 4 times in Richmond Hill, presented to Western University Engineering
In consultation with the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (RIS), the Ontario Centre of Excellence (OCE), and the Canadian Society of Physicists (CAP), IMSG’s Alberta lab developed an application of quantum nanotechnology, building on current MIT and NASA research on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) condensed matter quantum effects, pioneered in 1989.
Intelligent Market Solutions Group www.imsg.ca was founded at the University Waterloo in 1989. IMSG is a security and securities training and development firm, creating a year 2000 hybrid blockchain cloud expert system, launching start-up PriceMetrix, today tracking $6 trillion in investment assets. IMSG provides classified services to organizations like Environment and Climate Change Canada, Atomic Energy Canada Limited (AECL), Ontario Power Generation (OPG), Department of National Defence (DND), Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), and Lockheed Martin.
B. MILESTONES / STAKEHOLDERS ⇯
Richmond Hill MP Majid Jowhari, and Ontario Research, Innovation and Science Minister Dr. Reza Moridi provide direction leading to federal security agency guidance with Defence and the Canadian Space Agency.
June 24, 2016
Canadian Intellectual Property (IP) Office Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada enforcement advise on consumer vs. military application with Security of Information Act guidance to assess technology, and bring to market.
July 7, 2016
IMSG present a $2.6 trillion ROI plan through the York Region Defence Policy Review and Veterans Affairs Town Hall hosted by retired Royal Canadian Air Force Officer MP Leona Alleslev (Chair).
Aug 12, 2016
MPP Dr. Reza Moridi receives an update, Richmond Hill, Aug 12, 2016
Aug 18, 2016
Robert Fedosejevs, CAP Past President provides direction with University of Alberta and Western University.
Aug 22, 2016
University of Alberta Physics Chair Mauricio Sacchi speaks with IMSG.
Sept 12, 2016
Sept 12, 2016 Research and Development Canada (DRDC) Defence Department liaison MP Leona Alleslev receives an IMSG update, Richmond Hill
Oct 6, 2017
Ryerson University Aerospace Department sign off on discussions related to the project entitled “Quantum Fusion Controlled Electron Capture Reaction (CECR) as a Ryerson University / University of Toronto Hybrid Unified Blockchain for Application Platform (HUBCAP) anti-fraud and public safety agent use case research proposal to lower energy costs and increase FinTech jobs”.
Nov 20, 2017
York University, TheBlockChainHub agrees to host STEMSTAR conference supporting blockchain AI command and control drone systems for quantum fusion powered propulsion system development.
C. SCIENCE AND SCHEDULE ⇯
By IMSG Chief Scientist
C1. INTRODUCTION ⇯
Based on Moore’s law over the past 50 years, space age technology should be available today. I submit to achieve this we require courage to embrace the fourth highly competitive reform of industrial sectors. Looking at old ideas with new knowledge, we enter the realm of quantum sciences. The “spooky” things Einstein identified are more understandable through IMSG collaboration of worldwide science, theorizing what is actually happening at a quantum molecular dynamic level. Significant breakthroughs drive us to new heights as we enter the fourth industrial revolution epitomized by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at Davros, 2016. Just as Justin understood and explained the basics of quantum computing, we believe he will do so with quantum and nano technology application to fusion.
Our intention is to deploy the 2016 breakthrough to bridge the impasse of well accepted futuristic ideas, and bring about the expectations of society through a new power source. Working with the Canadian Association of Physicists (CAP) during their 100 year anniversary, we move matter conversion forward from under %5 to 50%. This may be a tipping point to power machines of science fiction. We stand as a team with the Canada Aviation and Space Museum’s tribute to popular science fiction, as an inspiration through the Canadian Space Agency to advance the commercialization of space as a new enterprise.
C2. ROOM TEMPERATURE FUSION ANALYSIS ⇯
|C2A||Canada||July 22, 2016||Condensed matter Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) fusion –
|IMSG claims repeatable sustained (Q>1) energy production through a hypothesized muon catalyzed quantum spin liquid form of fusion (quantum fusion).|
|C2B||USA||October 3, 2016||Condensed matter LENR fusion – non muonic catalyst||BEC/SRI Analysis*|
1. California based SRI International funded by Brillouin Energy Corp. (BEC/SRI) verify a working model of quantum fusion through their proprietary “WET Boiler” Isoperibol (IPB) Reactor design via accredited 3rd scientific party (link) with output estimate 2x the power input, through a simple boiler heat exchange output setup, using non-direct conversion to energy via turbine, equating to 1.4x useable energy converted to power: With an input of 1,000w there would be a 1,400w output realizing a net power output of 400W in their current boiler type generator, noting classic space and weight issues.
2. BEC/SRI states “a condensed matter, high-energy physics Quantum Fusion Hypothesis” as a possible electrochemistry application of the Andrea Rossi cold fusion design. Given BEC/SRI results were not consistent with the DTRA analysis, producing energetic protons (7MeV), suggests fusion over their stated electron capture, as indication of quantum mechanics to analyze and manipulate condensed matter fusion in face centered cubic hydrogen permeable mediums, as used by IMSG.
3. This experiment parallels a 2003 version.
Compared to IMSG Quantum Fusion
4. IMSG direct energy conversion requires no bulky water boilers making cell phone sized reactors possible.
5. IMSG use of subatomic particle catalyst increases energy production by 12.5 X over BEC/SRI WET Boiler technology.
6. Inherent safety mechanisms are built into the micro design of IMSG Quantum Fusion.
7. Safety concerns may not make this design viable as an efficient and cost effective means to energy production, although current design can be marketed as highly efficient space heater.
8. As per updated wikipedia update on cold fusion, “In May 2016, the United States House Committee on Armed Services report on the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, states it is ‘aware of recent positive developments in developing low-energy nuclear reactions’, and directed the Secretary of Defense to ‘provide a briefing on the military utility of recent U.S. industrial base LENR advancements to the House Committee on Armed Services by September 22, 2016.’
C3. THE SCIENCE ⇯
Let’s examine the 1989 Fleishmann-Pons Experiment.
The Fleischmann–Pons experiment suggested the possibility of low energy nuclear fusion taking place within lattice structures of certain materials, specifically, palladium. This work was not capitalized on, likely due to a reputational fallout due to what may be unfair criticism due to factor, like attempts at duplication gave up prior to sufficient time required for the subatomic particles to build up and go through a nuclear multi step reaction, noting MIT and NASA reported days until the reaction was noticed. The major breakthrough was the discovery of energetic protons (7MeV+) emitted from the palladium-deuterium reaction when the proton path align with carbon atoms with enough energy to releasing muons. This is significant because muonic deuterium inside the lattice has a greater chance of fusion. The lattice structure change (at 150 degrees Celsius) induces dynamic compression of the deuterium in condensed matter:
This increases their possible kinetic energy, being transferred from the palladium lattice change and increases proximity of housed deuterium molecules. Due to the confinement and decreased area, the molecules undergo a change to a theorized quantum spin liquid state. This enables gluon entanglement which synchronizes their (gluon) orbital path, and initiates a quantum well, which produces the force to fuse the atoms.
The Fleischmann–Pons Experiment arguably gave rise to 14 studies listed below including the 20 volume “Cold fusion compendium”.
|STUDIES AS RESOURCES VERIFYING IMSG RESEARCH AND DTRA ANALYSIS||IMSG ANALYSIS|
|1||http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MosierBossinvestigat.pdf||2016 DTRA analysis/proof|
|2||INIS https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:25013344||INIS cold fusion proof|
|3||LENR http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMcorrelatio.pdf||Excess heat from deuterium electrolysis|
|4||MIT http://dspace.mit.edu/openaccess-disseminate/1721.1/71632||“Summary of SRI results on the Case replication. (a) Plot showing correlation between 4 He and excess heat where ○ are gradient data points (y = 18.36 x, R2 = 0.99); – – – – is gradient Q = 31 ± 13 MeV/atom” P.13||MIT cold fusion proof achieved Q=31 ± 13 MeV/atom with Palladium/Lead anode/cathode “cold fusion” reaction|
|5||NASA http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19900008108||NASA cold fusion proof|
|6||Proof of CNT activity + Neutrons:||http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.3120111||*All referenced in “Proof 1 – Cold Fusion”||Neutrons released from highly charged CNT’s in deuterium|
|7||http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GodesRquantumfus.pdf||LENR cold fusion proof|
|8||http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/38/11/10.1063/1.1709162||Proof of electrostatic confinement fusion|
|9||http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015004||RVB lattice resonance|
|10||https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03228||Quantum spin liquid entanglement states|
|11||http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/025002||Quantum spin liquid entropy|
|12||http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol15.pdf||20 volume cold fusion compendium|
|13||http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=952||Andrea Rossi, recently discredited now confirmed reaction|
|14||http://www.lenr.com.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=7&id=763||China based condensed matter fusion induced by muons with power chart|
This led to over 100 experiments to date with positive results. The main problem with those results seemed to be lack of collaborating science. IMSG overcame this issue.
The collaborating science has been identified, triangulated and proposed through a rapid prototyping scientific research and experimental development template leading to a ready for deployment model.
IMSG deployed correlation methods reviewing the Fleischmann-Pons experiment, and many online studies (listed), to triangulate data of interest. For example, 1/10 studies used only palladium which did not yield a positive effect. In fact, the anomalous effect was not seen for days. The variables affecting the time to see a LENR reaction were triangulated and applied to quantum theories leading to the advanced application of quantum mechanics reproducible as a MatLab®, leading to newer efficient viable forms of LENR as environmentally friendly energy production.
C3b) Science application ⇯
IMSG Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) / Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reaction (LANR) utilization, is different from previous work as follows:
|1||IMSG’s “Cold Spark” makes use of nano-structures and isotopes converting subatomic particle energy to usable DC current. Total energy efficiency exceeds 50% in comparison to current nuclear power efficiency at <5%.|
|2||The catalyst applied is a directed muon subatomic particle emitter.|
|3||Loading time has been resolved by the IMSG “secret sauce”.|
|4||The quantum mathematical portion is clarified to be applicable to computer models rapid prototyping simulations through MatLab®.|
This led to the “Eureka” moment.
The Eureka moment came after IMSG studied the very small (quantum level) to explain the very big, in real world models. The real world models ranged from classical physics, like superconductors, to complex computational astrophysics, like black holes in the belief that across the board applicability is a requirement for valid science. The concept of quantum fusion through quantum spin liquid (a.k.a. “secret sauce”) came from mathematically linking, understanding, togetherness and division as per this table.
|1||Understanding||quantum information processing|
|3||Division||e.g. Hawking radiation|
The 1989 University of Waterloo mathematics department and St. Jerome’s “Quantum Principle” (quantum mathematics of philosophy) synergized physics and logic data interpretations providing a proposed quantum science theory to explain the room temperature fusion claimed by the Fleishmann-Pons experiment. The breakthrough was relating “special quantum relativity” to relativistic quantum mechanics. This breakthrough verified and unified conceptual and real life application through a triangulation micro-iterative rapid prototyping method, building on a Lockheed Martin method.
Deploying the IMSG quantum computing AI simulation used to launch PriceMetrix, IMSG applied quantum mechanics to substantiate quantum information theory. By unifying theory and application, the quantum principle lead to a parallel theory that speaks to a theory of everything (TOE) model. The first real world application of this model was the production of viable condensed matter fusion awaiting third party verification at Ryerson University. By utilizing the math behind these theories, a new understanding was garnered leading to the scientific advancements of understanding quantum entanglement “spooky action at a distance“. Deviating from currently accepted standardized models, The Quantum Principle unification of these theories explains gaps in special relativity, proving its efficacy through real world application targeting the St. Jerome’s philosophy of creation, in layman’s terms, “getting something from nothing”, as a form of synergy.
C3c) Working Prototype ⇯
This approach worked, leading to a affordable, reliable, compact (ARC) Reactor Mark I, II, and III designs.
IMSG created a working Mark I proof of concept.
July 22, 2016 IMSG LENR Muonic Quantum Fusion ARC Reactor Mark I, Richmond Hill,
Based on the simple nuclear Q value calculation, IMSG achieved positive Q value over and above the energy to start the reaction (catalyst), a derivative of Einstein’s E=MC2. The Richmond Hill Aug 22, 2016 Mark I testing data revealed the output of the electrolysis reaction was beyond that of a chemical reaction, giving merit to IMSG “Lattice condensed matter fusion” research.
IMSG Mark I achieved a positive Q value (positive energy output). Note there are many definitions for “Q” value all dealing with power and kinetic energy in some way. The math used to simplify the calculations needed to verify a positive energy output concurrent with MIT and NASA studies combine different “Q” value calculations, canceling out unnecessary complicated variables, leading to a simple equation needing only thermal imaging and three continuous temperature readings. The rapid prototyping process was applied to power input and electrolyte solutions providing a solid template of acquired data leading to more advanced testing with additional manipulated variables such as:
|1||Reaction medium (Metallurgy)|
|2||Sine wave current functions|
|3||Exotic subatomic particle vectors|
|4||Magnetic field manipulation|
|5||High TC superconductor research|
|6||Direct energy conversion|
For a more economical and powerful solution, quantum molecular study is required on the twelve (12) condensed matter fusion metallurgy alternative combination candidates to the Mark I palladium core.
The fuel for the scalable mini reactor range from the application of normal Quantum Fusion to more exotic prototypes exceeding 50% conversion of particle energy to usable energy is through exotic subatomic particle vectors, where muon catalyst reproduction application of subatomic particles such as other leptons, known to be produced via certain particle interactions, lead to harnessing the power of newly discovered quantum mechanic subatomic particle combinations.
The Schedule ⇯
Qualified accredited investors and scientific third parties are invited to participate in our clean energy journey.
|1.||Municipality interest to participate in $1 billion revenue generation and cost savings field test.||DONE|
|2.||Recreate Mark I 5-20W Proof of Concept
|3.||University 3rd party verification of the July 22, 2016 Mark I Proof of Concept showing energy output nuclear Q value=39.56MeV/atom* as excess heat via simple bomb calorimetry, and mass spectrometry showing fusion** with collected gases.*Corresponds to MIT expectations of “Q = 31 ± 13 MeV/atom”.**LENR: Nuclear transmutation of Deuterium (2H) with atomic mass of 2, to Helium-4 (4He) with atomic mass of 4.||2018Q1|
|4.||Mark II 500W hand-held demo copy ready for roadshow (1400g, 20cmx5cmx5cm).||2018Q2|
|5.||Mark III 10,000W consumer class 10-year house battery production ready copy ready for roadshow (weight and size to be determined).||2019Q1|
|6.||Mark IV 1MW-1GW office or industrial complex high output generator class 10-year power cell ready for development. (Weight and size to be determined.)||2019Q4|